Composition is just a fancy word for how elements are
arrange within a scene. Sound simple? Yes it does. But putting it in practice is a different story.
Now on the surface this might not sound that important when
creating a picture/painting, and you might hastily think that super awesome rendering skills with
a pencil is something way more important than this silly “composition”. But
after seeing a wide range of the good, the bad and the ugly of a good few pictures
I can say composition is very
important.
Good composition keeps the viewers attention, and surely
that’s what the artist wants. They want all their years of hard work to master
their abilities and art to be appreciated. Or they just want them to buy it,
yeah maybes it’s that - the more they
look at it , generally the more they like it, so they’re more likely to buy it.
Money makes the world go round and all…
Composition can be put into several categories/rules, these
are :
Line
Shape
Colour
Texture
Form
Value
Space
Shape
Colour
Texture
Form
Value
Space
These rules are not something you can ‘just get’ and apply
awesomeness to all your paintings. It takes time to learn them, understand
them, and apply them correctly. Analysing paintings from the masters to see
what they did and why will help you progress at a quicker pace. And as a side
benefit you’ll also start to appreciate art more too. For instance I’ve seen a few paintings I
liked when I was younger, like “Composition with Red Blue Yellow”, and some I
just thought “Really? That’s art?!” aka the works of Piet Mondrian . But I
never knew why, but now that I understand the techniques, like the golden
rectangle, I can see the hard work and thought process behind these paintings,
making me appreciate them more.
An hour lecture changed my opinion of this from WTF?! to Woah |
Look at books, good book on composition. Santa bring me
this: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mastering-Composition-Techniques-Principles-Dramatically/dp/1581809247/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1353453256&sr=8-3
A bit of researching of good vs. bad composition threw up
some interesting reads. A good link I found was here http://digital-lighting.150m.com/ch07lev1sec3.html
(It has other pages which are worth a
read, but the link deals with just composition) It goes through what makes a
particular image bad, and how changing something very minor has a major impact,
compositionally. Another golden link http://sevencamels.blogspot.co.uk/2006/03/10-minute-art-school-composition-101.html
I’ve listed the points in the painting below on the compositional
techniques ive put and noticed in the painting:
A – There are a series of swooping lines which guide the
users eye to the vanishing point, such as the brick walls and the line of trees
with fencing.
B – Gives the viewer a sense of depth, trees were not this
uniform in real life, but to get a better sense of depth I used artistic license
to arrange these trees more uniformly.
C - I’ve made a tonal gradient from dark in the bottom right
to light in the top left
D - There are different focal points across the image, such
as the stone bridge in the bottom left and the tress to the right, disappearing
into the vanishing point. All of these points keeps the viewers eyes wondering
around the image (not aimlessly though) making it interesting.
When selecting what picture I wanted to paint I wanted my
gut instinct/artistic eye make the judgement of which one had the best
composition. It’s hard to explain, but when looking at pictures/paintings with
bad composition it feels like your eyes are straining, I guess this is your
brain trying to recognise patterns within the picture but cant. On the flip
side you get a fuzzy feeling when you look at something nice. So when I get
that feeling, I go for it. That is why I selected the above painting rather
than the other 200 photos I took at Bradgate.
No comments:
Post a Comment